In this section...

Note: PHIAC does not collect or provide information or statistics more explicit than the state/territory level. PHIAC is unable to provide information by Postcode, Local Governement Area or any other area contained inside a state or territory.

September 2009

Quarterly Statistics

September 2009

Suggested citation: Private Health Insurance Administration Council, Quarterly Statistics September 2009, PHIAC, Canberra, 2009

Contents

Snapshot of the industry

Membership and coverage

  Hospital treatment
  General treatment

Benefits paid

  Hospital treatment
  General treatment
  Medical benefits
  Prostheses benefits

Service utilisation

Out-of-pocket payments

Financial information

  Financial performance
  Prudential position

 

Snapshot of the industry  

 

 Hospital and general membership
 

Hospital treatment membership
44.7% at 30 September 2009
0.12% points from 30 June2009
75,721 insured persons over the quarter

 General treatment membership
51.4% at 30 September 2009

 ↑ 0.2% points from 30 June 2009

    105,443 insured persons over the quarter

 

 

 

 

  Hospital and general episodes
 

Hospital treatment episodes
5.5% over the 12 months to Sept 2009
5.3% over the quarter

General treatment services (ancillary)
 5.3% over the 12 months to Sept 2009
0.6% over the quarter

 

 Hospital and general benefits

 

Hospital treatment benefits
11.2% over the 12 months to Sept 2009
6.4.% over the quarter

General treatment benefits
 7.5% over the 12 months to Sept 2009
0.7% over the quarter

 

 out of pocket episodes

 

Hospital treatment out-of-pocket
$300.97

General treatment out-of-pocket
$48.63

 

 financial performance

 

Premium revenue
7.5%

Profit before tax 
 69.7%

contents

 

Membership and coverage

as at 30 September 2009 
Hospital treatment 

 

At 30 September 2009, 9,820,963 persons, or 44.7% of the population, were covered by Hospital Treatment cover. The percentage of the population covered increased 0.12 % points, compared to the June 2009 quarter.

There was an increase in coverage of 75,721 insured persons in the September 2009 quarter. There was an increase of 14,463 single policies and an increase of 17,970 family policies during the quarter. There was a net increase of 32,433 hospital policies. Over the year, from 30 September 2008, the number of insured persons with hospital treatment cover has increased by 218,591 persons and 119,278 policies.

There was a notable increase in coverage during the quarter of 10,136 persons for people aged 20 to 24, reversing a similar decline in this age in the June quarter. There were increases in all age groups over the quarter (except for 90–94, with a marginal decrease of 245. Increases in the older age groups are partly due to ageing of the insured population with people moving from younger to older age cohorts but there is also growing proportions of insured persons in these age groups.

 

 

Lifetime health cover 

 

The majority of adults with hospital cover (89.0%) have a certified age of entry of 30, with no penalty loading. However, the proportion of adults with hospital cover paying a loading has increased every quarter since the introduction of Lifetime Health Cover.

At the end of the September 2009 quarter, there were 782,080 persons with a certified age of entry of more than 30 and subject to Lifetime Health Cover loading; a net increase in persons paying a penalty over the year of 89,104.

There was a net increase in persons with a certified age of entry of 30 (with no penalty) over the year of 73,923.

 

 

Net quarterly change in insured persons

 

Net quarterly change in insured persons 

Number of insured persons by age

 Number of insured persons by age

Hospital treatment tables 

Hospital treatment tables

 contents

 

General treatment 

 

At 30 September 2009, 11,304,187 persons or 51.4% of the population had some form of General Treatment cover. There was an increase in the percent of the population covered of 0.2 percentage points, compared to the June 2009 quarter.

There was an increase in coverage of 105,443 insured persons in the September 2009 quarter. There was an increase of 20,216 single policies and an increase of 25,299 family policies during the quarter. There was a net increase of 45,515 general treatment policies.

Over the year, to 30 September, the number of insured persons with general treatment cover has increased by 361,217 persons and 190,960 policies.

The General Treatment (ancillary) by age charts and data in this reports show persons that have general treatment policies that cover ancillary services such as dental treatment, and excludes those General Treatment policies that do not cover ancillary treatment. The March 2009 quarter is the first quarter since March 2007 in which data is collected according to this definition. The aim of this change is to map the trend in ancillary coverage prior to 1 April 2007 to the current period.

There was an increase in coverage of 102,128 persons with General Treatment ancillary coverage in the September 2009 quarter. The largest increases in coverage, 11,631 persons, was for people in the 20–24 age cohort.

The 20 to 29 age group historically has a lower proportion of persons with general treatment insurance compared to other age groups. The increase in the September quarter reverses a similar size decrease in the June 2009 quarter.

 

Net quarterly change in insured persons (ancillary)

Net quarterly change in insured persons (ancillary)

Number of insured persons by age (ancillary)

Number of insured persons by age (ancillary)

General treatment tables

 General treatment tables 

 

Includes all general treatment persons              

Includes only general treatment persons with
ancillary coverage

 Includes all general treatment persons

contents

 

Benefits paid 

Hospital treatment   
Benefits per episode/service

 

 

September 2009
$

Change from 
June 2009
%

Acute

1,911.24

1.2

Medical

54.32

0.0

Prostheses

773.88

-0.2

   Cardiac

5,773.51

-1.5

   Hips

2,603.81

-0.7

   Knees

2,215.83

-0.5

   Lens

429.45

1.6

Total benefits

 

 

Hospital

2,234,547,447

6.4

General

730,594,434

-0.7

 

During the September 2009 quarter, insurers paid $2,235 million in hospital treatment benefits. This was an increase of 6.4% compared to the June 2009 quarter. Hospital treatment benefits were comprised of:

  • $1,558 million for hospital services such as accommodation and nursing
  • $361 million for medical services
  • $314 million for prostheses items.

Benefits paid for hospital treatment by age and gender (top chart) show the total benefits paid in each age group. The age group for which most hospital benefits are paid is between 60 and 79. The benefits per person (middle chart) are affected by the age of the person and the number of persons in each age group. The older
age groups have a higher claiming rate. The rise in benefits in 20–39 age cohorts is due to increases in female benefits associated with child bearing.

Hospital treatment benefits per person during the year increased from $787.11 to $855.83. The largest amount of benefits per person was spent on hospital accommodation and nursing, followed by medical and prostheses benefits.

 

Hospital treatment benefits paid by age 12 months to 30 September 2009

Hospital treatment benefits paid by age 12 months to 30 September 2009

Hospital treatment benefits per person and percentage of benefits paid by age cohort 
 
Hospital treatment benefits per person and percentage of benefits paid by age cohort
Hospital treatment benefits per person

Hospital treatment benefits per person 

contents

 

General treatment  

 

 

June 2009
$

Change from
March 2009
%

Dental

53.75 

-0.9 

Chiropractic

23.80 

-2.3

Physiotherapy

27.78

-0.8

Optical

64.44 

-1.2 

 

During the September 2009 quarter, insurers paid $731 million in general treatment (ancillary) benefits. This was a decrease of 0.7% compared to the June 2009 quarter. Ancillary benefits for the September quarter included the major categories of:

  • Dental $384 milion
  • Optical $114 million
  • Physiotherapy $60 million
  • Chiropractic $52 million.

There is a marked difference between the distribution of benefits over age groups between hospital benefits and ancillary benefits. The major difference is the higher claiming rate in older age groups for hospital benefits while benefits per person for ancillary benefits are more evenly spread over the age groups.

General treatment ancillary benefits per person during the year to September 2009 were $287.36, increasing from $252.58 in the year to September 2008. The largest component of ancillary benefits is dental for which $148.06 was paid per person during the year to September 2009.

 

General treatment benefits paid by age 12 months to 30 September 2009 (ancillary)

 General treatment benefits paid by age 12 months to 30 September 2009 (ancillary)

General treatment benefits per person and percentage of benefits paid by age cohort (ancillary)

General treatment benefits per person and percentage of benefits paid by age cohort (ancillary)

General Treatment benefits per person (ancillary)

General Treatment benefits per person (ancillary)

contents

 

Medical Benefits 

 

Total benefits for medical services increased 8.0% during the quarter and the number of medical services in the quarter increased by 8.0%. Benefits paid on average for the medical services did not change during the quarter.

The increase in medical benefits per service was calculated over a range of medical services and does not mean medical services overall increased in cost. The increase in benefits paid may reflect a change in the type of medical services utilised, or a change in the overall utilisation of medical services. The medical service for which the greatest amount of benefits was paid was anaesthetics, comprising 24% of all medical benefits and totalling $86.868 million.

Medical benefits paid by speciality group

Medical benefits paid by speciality group

 

contents

 

Prostheses benefits 

 

Total benefits paid for prostheses over the quarter increased 3%, compared to the June quarter. Benefits paid per prosthetic decreased 0.2% per item during the quarter. Similar to medical services, the increase in benefits paid for prostheses was calculated over a range of prosthetics (see chart) and does not mean prostheses overall increased in cost. The increase in benefits paid may reflect a change in the type of prosthetics utilised, or a change in the overall utilisation of prosthetics. The prosthetic groups for which the greatest amount of benefits were paid were "hips" and "knees", comprising 29% of all prosthetic benefits and totalling $92 million. The combined cardiac group comprised 21.8% of all prosthetics and totalled $68 million over the quarter

 

Benefits paid for prostheses

Benefits paid for prostheses

 

contents 

 

Service utilisation 

 

By Type

September 2009
$

Change from 
June  2009
%

Hosptal Episodes

815,109 5.4

Hospital Days

2,176,948

6.0

Medical Services

6,643,110 8.0

Prostheses Items

405,337 3.5

   Cardiac

11,834 -4.0

   Hips

17,416 2.9

   Knees

20,964 2.3

   Lens

25,375 5.4

General Treatment Services

16,298,647 0.6

   Dental

7,142,690

2.4

   Chiropractic

2,195,694 -0.2

   Physiotherapy

2,151,591 2.3

   Optical

1,769,224 0.7

 

During the September 2009 quarter, insurers paid benefits for 2.177 million days in hospital, arising from 815,109 hospital episodes of care.

The average length of stay was 2.67 days; a decrease of 0.6% compared to the June 2009 quarter. The utilisation rates for hospital episodes, medical services and prostheses services increased during the quarter, continuing the general trend.

 

Hospital utilisation is distributed over four categories of hospital: public, private, day only facilities and hospital-substitute. During the September 2009 quarter hospital episodes were distributed as follows:

  • public hospitals 116,553 episodes
  • private hospitals 576,554 episodes

  • day hospital facilities 118,714 episodes

  • hospital-substitute 3,288 episodes.

 

Between the June 2009 and September 2009 quarters hospital utilisation increased in all categories of hospital except for hospital- substitute. These increases continue the trend with increases in utilisation in all categories over the year from September 2008 to September 2009.

 

 

 

 

Quarter change
%

 

Year change
%

public hospitals

5.1

6.6

private hospitals

4.9

5.3

day hospital facilities

9.0

5.4

hospital-substitute

-18.3

5.9

 

Day-only episodes in the four categories of hospital totaled 512,032, an increase of 6.2% compared to the June 2009 quarter.

 

Hospital treatment services per 1,000 insured persons

Hospital treatment services per 1,000 insured persons

 

 

General treatment services per 1,000 insured persons

General treatment services per 1,000 insured persons

contents  

 

Out-of-pocket payments 

 

By Type

September 2009
$

Change from 
June  2009
%

Change from  
September  2008
%

Hosptal treatment

300.97 0.1 1.9

Hospital-substitute treatment

13.22 932.3 306.4

General treatment

48.63 1.2 1.4

Prostheses where gap was paid

34.03 15.7 5.7

Medical gap where gap was paid

140.49 -3.4 -1.7

 

The average out of pocket (gap) payment for a hospital episode was $300.97 in the September 2009 quarter and included out-of-pocket payments for medical services and some prostheses as well as any excess or co payment amounts relating to hospital accommodation. The out of pocket payments for hospital episodes increased by 1.9% compared to the same quarter of the previous year.

Out of pocket payments for medical services were $140.49 where an out of pocket payment was payable. The amount of gap for medical services varies depending on the specialty group. The specialty group with the largest out of pocket payment was plastic/reconstructive with an average gap of $345.88, followed by orthopaedic with an average gap per service of $275.12, followed by neurosurgical and then urology. Plastic/reconstructive medical services incurred the largest gap as a percent of the fee followed by urology, neurosurgical and "ear, nose and throat". The state with the highest amount of gap payment where gap was paid was New South Wales.

 

Medical benefits and out-of-pocket by speciality group

Medical benefits and out-of-pocket by speciality group

 

Proportion of services and average out-of-pocket payments

Proportion of services and average out-of-pocket payments

 

contents  

Financial information

Financial performance 

 

All Figures $'000

12 months
to September
2009*

12 months to September 2008

Revenue

 

 

HIB premium revenue

13,360,256

12,424,974

Net HRB and other revenue

216,189 -48,899

Total revenue

13,576,445 12,376,075

Benefits

 

 

Fund benefits

11,457,610

10,513,795

State ambulance levies

149,811 139,063

Total fund benefits

11,607,421 10,652857

Expenses

 

 

HIB expenses

1,014,651 1,055188

HIB claims handling

255,217 257,325

Other expenses

7,919 3,268

Total expenses

1,277,788 1,315,780

Profit

 

 

Profit/(loss) before tax

691,235 407,438

Taxation expense

106,516 87,676

Profit/(loss) after tax

584,720 319,762

Non HBF related profit/(loss)

3,764 -1,036

Profit/(loss) of the insurer

588,484 318,726

Margins

 

 

Gross margin

13.12% 14.26%

HIB expenses

9.50% 10.56%

Net margin

3.61% 3.70%

 

 

Total benefits paid by the industry for the 12 months to 30 September 2009 was $954 million more than the prior

12 months. The underlying cause of the increase has been, and continues to be, the ageing of the population, advancements in technology and membership growth.

Offsetting the increase in benefits, contribution income had also increased by $935 million over the same period. This increase is due to the growth in membership as well as the average weighted premium increase of 6.02% which was implemented on 1 April 2009.

The reduction in gross margin over the past 12 months was offset by a similar reduction in management expenses thus there was a negligible difference in the net margin for the 12 months to 30 September 2009 and 30 September 2008. In addition, improving economic conditions provided a stronger return on investments resulting in $691 million in profit before tax for the period. In contrast, the industry had only recorded $407 million in profit before tax for the 12 months to 30 September 2009.

 

Health benefits fund profit after tax breakdown for 12 months to 30 September 2009

Health benefits fund profit after tax breakdown for 12 months to 30 September 2009

contents 

 

Prudential position 

 

All Figures $'000

As as
September

2009

 

As at
September 2008

Health benefits fund financial assets

 

 

Cash

379,607 1,592,513

Investments

   

Equities

791,134 948,553

Bonds & other fixed interest securities

5,122,182 4,509,810

Property

407,629 446,061

Subsidiary and associated entities

673,518 399,352

Loans

86,567 273,301

Premiums receivable

77,893 90,462

Intangibles DAC and FITBS

65,006 70,556

Prepayments

21,428 25,410

Other**

765,290 832,345

Total assets

8,390,254 9,188,364

Health insurance liabilities

   

Unearned premium liabilities

1,486,066 1,408,452

Unpresented & outstanding claims

1,432,556 1,349,254

Other fund liabilities

125,411 155,229

Interest bearing liabilities

30,363 29,424

Payables, provisions & other liabilities

446,735 467,639

Total liabilities

3,521,131 3,369,998

Health benefits fund capital

4,894,124 5,843,366

Solvency requirement

5,173,356 5,201,687

Capital adequacy requirement

5,413,058 5,517,965

**includes health insurance equipment and other assets

 

All private health insurers remained compliant with the Capital Adequacy and Solvency Requirements. As at 30 September 2009, the industry as a whole had $2.98 billion (30 September 2008: $3.67 billion) in excess of its capital requirements. The reduction of excess assets has been primarily due to the reduction in asset value caused by the impact of the Global Financial Crisis, dividend payments provided for by the for-profit insurers, and consolidation of the industry causing an increase in the inadmissible component.

PHIAC notes that private health insurers continue to increase their asset exposure to more conservative investments that are expected to have a lower return for lower risk.

 

Health benefits fund assets vs liabilities as at 30 September 2009

Health benefits fund assets vs liabilities as at 30 September 2009